NON-FOODS
Video-Assisted Ignorance
By Frank Zappa
Guitar Player, 1984 April
ALL PREVIOUS "Non-Foods" columns have been prepared as question-answer items,
resulting from interviews conducted by Guitar Player staff (either by
phone or in person). This column, and hopefully some others in the future, will
be handled as pieces of original writing, designed for the interests of GP
readers.
Since I seldom touch the guitar anymore, trying to think of "guitar-oriented
conversational topics" – in the strictest sense – is a bit difficult, but as the
name of the column suggests, there are other matters worth commenting on for the
benefit of people who play music. Our topic for today will be: Video-assisted
ignorance.
Rock videos are expensive. An average cheapie costs $40,000, and on the high
side they cost $300,000 (and some, I have heard, cost even more than that).
Everybody wants to make one. Everybody believes they are wonderful. Everybody
believes they help careers and motivate tremendous record sales. Let's look at
it realistically.
Who pays for it? You probably will. Even with "exclusions" in your record
contract, plainly stating that if a video is produced, the company will pick up
the tab, you (as an artist) are at the mercy of the record company if they
decide – as one major record company recently did – that all such exclusions are
void. This means that even if the record company told you they were going to
pick up the tab for your splendid little video masterpiece, they can give you a
hose job any time. They hold all your royalties. They will take the cost of the
video out of your pocket before you make a nickel from any records sold. And as
an artist, you don't stand a chance of prevailing against them in court, even if
you decide to spend five years and a few hundred thousand dollars suing them.
As a musician in America, your value as a human being is (to put it mildly) small. If you are a rock and roll guitarist
– less than small. If you go to court
with them, the judge will look at them and their well-tailored lawyers and say,
"These are honest, worthwhile, productive members of an important American
industry. "Then he'll look at you and say, "Scum of the earth! How dare you
complain about your treatment by these fine men? Do you think you even have a
right to be alive in our great land? Go away, and be thankful I have not given
you the death penalty for questioning the behavior of this spotless company!"
Make no mistake: You will pay!
What will you get for your money? Less than you think. If you think your video
promo with that terrific new song (that sounds like everybody else's new song,
and even uses the same stupid shots of the "group running down the wet street," the close-up of the "rented cute girl's lips," the medium shot of the car
door, the dove, the "outer space," the wide-angle "lead vocalist's grimace," the
etc.) is going to get the entire planet excited, then you are jerking yourself
off. You can listen to a good record hundreds of times and still like it. You
can watch a video maybe six times and it's boring.
When you watch a video, better than 50% of what you experience and react to is
visual. You don't hum it; you watch it, like any other TV material. It doesn't
matter. It is only "stuff." It is (usually by intent) just a commercial for a
record. Some people have the nerve to think of this as video art. These same
people think of Cabbage Patch dolls as a revolutionary form of "soft sculpture."
But won't we sell a million records? Maybe you will. Maybe you have good
music on your record. If the radio plays it, then it will sell. If your
video gets exposure, maybe the radio will play your record. But it will be
the radio that sells the record.
Read by OCR software. If you spot errors, let me know afka (at) afka.net
|